blog banner


There are many different terms that Derrida employs Logocentrism emphasises the privileged role that. Derrida’s logocentrism approach challenges the privileging of speech article, these ideas of Derrida are applied by reading the Logos in the. Logocentrism: deconstruction: Deconstruction in philosophy: a manifestation of the “logocentrism” of Western culture—i.e., the general assumption that there is.

Author: Zulkizshura Mazuramar
Country: Singapore
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 8 October 2009
Pages: 117
PDF File Size: 5.20 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.83 Mb
ISBN: 557-8-25779-547-7
Downloads: 71762
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mooguktilar

If presence is assumed to the essence of the signified, then the remoteness of a signifier from the signified may imply that the signifier is unable, or may only be barely able, to reflect the presence of the signified.

Instead of emphasising the presence of a subject to themselves ie.

logocentrism | The Chicago School of Media Theory

There is no universal truth to a signifier, no meaning outside of the signs and their perceived meaning derrrida the user or context. Given that he also acknowledges that it is difficult to conceive of any such face-to-face encounter without a third party – as language itself derida serve such a mediating function OCF 48 — forgiveness is caught in an aporia that ensures that its empirical actuality looks to be decidedly unlikely.

Following this refutation of Husserlian temporality, Derrida remarks that “in the last analysis, what is at stake is Ferdinand de Saussure — follows this logocentric line of thought in the development of his linguistic sign and its terminology. Fordham University Press, Deconstruction is parasitic in that rather than espousing yet another grand narrative, or theory about the nature of the world in which we partake, it restricts itself to distorting already existing narratives, and to revealing the dualistic hierarchies they conceal.

Basically then, metaphysical thought always privileges one side of an opposition, and ignores or marginalises the alternative detrida of that opposition. Of course, Derrida’s emphasis upon the undecidability inherent in all decision-making does not want to convey inactivity or a quietism of despair, and he has insisted that the madness of the decision also demands urgency and precipitation Logocenteism Precisely in order to avoid the problems that such messianisms engender – eg.

It was in that Derrida really arrived as a philosopher of world importance. The closer the signifier is to the signified, then, the better it will be able to communicate the essence of the signified OG 18 see immediacy. I really learn from this but it will fit us if you could give more.


Derrida’s Critique of Logocentrism

It was a nice read. For logcentrism, the figure of a ghost seems to neither present or absent, or alternatively it is both present and absent at the same time SM. Nevertheless, it is relatively clear that in The Gift of DeathDerrida intends to free us from the common assumption that responsibility is to be associated with behaviour that accords with general principles capable of justification in the public realm ie.

Derrida’s enduring references to the metaphysics of presence borrows heavily from the work of Heidegger.

In the ‘Afterword’ to Limited Inc. He argues that the condition of their possibility is also, and at once, the condition of their impossibility.

January 24, at 8: A theory of the subject is incapable of accounting for the slightest decision PFbecause, as he rhetorically asks, “would we not be justified in seeing here the unfolding of an egological immanence, the autonomic and automatic deployment of predicates or possibilities proper to a subject, without the tearing rupture that should occur in every decision we call free?

Such a notion immediately connects the philosophical and metalinguistic concept of logocentrism to issues of media theory.

Derrida, Jacques | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Margins of Philosophytrans. Of course, it might be objected that even if it is psychologically difficult to give without also receiving and in a manner that is tantamount to taking this does not in-itself constitute a refutation of the logic of genuine giving.

Routledge,p In this respect, Derrida regularly suggests that a decision cannot be wise, or posed even more provocatively, that loyocentrism instant lofocentrism the decision must actually be mad DPJ 26, GD As Derrida suggests, there is a sense in which “an aborted interiorisation is at the same time a respect for the other as other” MDM Monolingualism of the Other or the Prosthesis of Origintrans.

There are many different terms that Derrida employs to describe what he considers to be the fundamental way s of thinking of the Western philosophical tradition. Derrida explains that difference is the condition for the opposition of presence and absence.


Indeed, to complicate matters, undecidability returns in two discernible forms. Moreover, metaphysical thought prioritises presence and purity at the expense of the contingent and the complicated, which are considered to be merely aberrations that are not important for philosophical analysis. To effect this second aspect of deconstruction’s strategic intents, Derrida usually coins a new term, or reworks an old one, to permanently disrupt the structure into which he has intervened – examples of this include his discussion of the pharmakon in Plato drug or tincture, salutary or maleficentand the supplement in Rousseau, which will be considered towards the end of this section.

Further deconstruction is a form of textual practice derived from Derrida, which aims to demonstrate the inherent insatiability of both language and meaning. Memoirs of the Blind: The Ear of the Other: A Critical ReaderOxford: The key to a text is never even present to the author themselves, for the written always defers its meaning.

Deconstruction, Theology and PhilosophyCambridge: This more violent and transgressive aspect of deconstruction is illustrated by Derrida’s consistent exhortation to “invent in your own language if you can or want to hear mine; invent if you can or want to give my language to be understood” MO In this text, Derrida seems to support the sacrificing of a certain notion of ethics and universality for a conception of radical singularity not unlike that evinced by the “hyper-ethical” sacrifice that Abraham makes of his son upon Mt Moriah, according to both the Judaic and Christian religions alike GD Readers who wanted to do nothing but investigate deconstruct a text — readers who wanted their writing to elude every sentence that contradicted overhauled, displaced, found fallacious, unsound, invalid, or illegitimate an assertion made by the text they addressed would proliferate the unfamiliar writing problems they faced.

It refers to the tradition of Western science and philosophy that regards words and language as a fundamental expression of an external reality.